Does a successful exercise prove the model is safe?
No. Results apply to the application, configuration and scenarios tested. Model updates, new documents, different prompts or added tools can change its behaviour and may require further testing.
Challenge your LLM application with adversarial scenarios before those failures affect users or customers.
Discuss your testing needsFor teams building or deploying LLM applications, copilots and RAG systems that need evidence of how their controls behave under attack.
LLM red teaming uses adversarial scenarios to investigate how an application can be pushed outside its intended behaviour. We test the configured system, including its instructions, retrieved content and integrations. The useful result is an account of the conditions that produced a failure, its consequence and the control that needs to change.
An account of the adversarial scenarios tested, reproducible findings, observed impact and practical recommendations. We document the limits of the exercise and can retest agreed changes.
Scope, assessment criteria, test access and deliverables are agreed before work begins. See our assurance methodology.
No. Results apply to the application, configuration and scenarios tested. Model updates, new documents, different prompts or added tools can change its behaviour and may require further testing.
Yes. Retrieval introduces its own questions about document access, hostile source content and disclosure. Those boundaries can be included in the agreed exercise.
Explore how this work fits into AI Product Assurance, or compare all assurance services.
Explore specific testing needs within an assurance engagement.
Understand how your AI application handles hostile inputs, sensitive data and the access it has been given.
02Challenge your LLM application with adversarial scenarios before those failures affect users or customers.
03Test what your agent can read, change and trigger, and whether its permissions match the job it has been given.
Tell us about the system, the access it has and the decision the evidence needs to support.